Everyone complaining about Microsoft buying GitHub needs to offer a better solution
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/06/everyone-complaining-about-microsoft-buying-github-needs-to-offer-a-better-solution/
Microsoft is buying GitHub for $7.5 billion dollars, and predictably, there's a developer backlash.
GitHub, though notionally a for-profit company, has become an essential, integral part of the open-source community. GitHub offers free hosting for open-source projects and has risen to become the premiere service for collaborative, open-source development: the authoritative source repository for many of these projects, with GitHub's own particular pull-request-based workflow becoming a de facto standard approach for taking code contributions.
Everyone complaining about Microsoft buying GitHub needs to offer a better solution
Jun 5, 2018, 12:31am UTC
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/06/everyone-complaining-about-microsoft-buying-github-needs-to-offer-a-better-solution/
> Microsoft is buying GitHub for $7.5 billion dollars, and predictably, there's a developer backlash.
> GitHub, though notionally a for-profit company, has become an essential, integral part of the open-source community. GitHub offers free hosting for open-source projects and has risen to become the premiere service for collaborative, open-source development: the authoritative source repository for many of these projects, with GitHub's own particular pull-request-based workflow becoming a de facto standard approach for taking code contributions.