The Indictment Against Malware Researcher Marcus Hutchines Is Really Weird

The Indictment Against Malware Researcher Marcus Hutchines Is Really Weird

7 years ago
Anonymous $Gu9VYqcl-R

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170804/00355537921/indictment-against-malware-researcher-marcus-hutchines-is-really-weird.shtml

So, yesterday, we wrote a quick post about recently-famous malware research Marcus Hutchins (famous for accidentally stopping the WannaCry attack) being detained by the FBI as he left Defcon. An hour or so later, we updated it with the details of the indictment which had been released. That had my quick response, which noted that the "evidence" didn't seem very strong. It just claims (without anything else) that Hutchins wrote the Kronos malware, and most of the indictment and most of the activity focuses on a second defendant (whose name is redacted) who apparently was out selling the malware. I was planning to write up a more thorough look at the indictment and its problems today, but last night, Orin Kerr beat me to it, and he (famed lawyer, law professor and former assistant US attorney) has a bit more expertise in the subject, so let's work off of his analysis.

The crux of the indictment is that Hutchins and the unnamed "co-conspirator" worked together to create and sell malware, leading Kerr to ask the fairly obvious question:

The Indictment Against Malware Researcher Marcus Hutchines Is Really Weird

Aug 4, 2017, 8:11pm UTC
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170804/00355537921/indictment-against-malware-researcher-marcus-hutchines-is-really-weird.shtml >So, yesterday, we wrote a quick post about recently-famous malware research Marcus Hutchins (famous for accidentally stopping the WannaCry attack) being detained by the FBI as he left Defcon. An hour or so later, we updated it with the details of the indictment which had been released. That had my quick response, which noted that the "evidence" didn't seem very strong. It just claims (without anything else) that Hutchins wrote the Kronos malware, and most of the indictment and most of the activity focuses on a second defendant (whose name is redacted) who apparently was out selling the malware. I was planning to write up a more thorough look at the indictment and its problems today, but last night, Orin Kerr beat me to it, and he (famed lawyer, law professor and former assistant US attorney) has a bit more expertise in the subject, so let's work off of his analysis. >The crux of the indictment is that Hutchins and the unnamed "co-conspirator" worked together to create and sell malware, leading Kerr to ask the fairly obvious question: