Intel in the water for lack of promised driver updates and GPUs for ARC Graphics

Intel in the water for lack of promised driver updates and GPUs for ARC Graphics

2 years ago
Anonymous $dy9SWuvIkX

https://wccftech.com/intel-in-the-water-for-lack-of-promised-driver-updates-and-gpus-for-arc-graphics/

Over one month ago, Intel assured customers that the Intel ARC graphics lineup would see a driver update. Readers will remember that Intel created a separate branch code for the ARC and Iris drivers, which was older than the primary support that they have given for most of their integrated graphics.

The company's initial plans were to offer an updated driver by the last part of April, including the capability to deactivate optimizations focused on benchmarking. Including this update with the option to activate or deactivate the optimization would allow users to achieve more validity in their UL 3D mark benchmark test scores. With it currently missing, any UL 3D Mark tests processed with included optimization would be considered invalid due to UL's policies. However, the performance at this point sites at an increase of fifteen percent.

Intel in the water for lack of promised driver updates and GPUs for ARC Graphics

May 6, 2022, 8:17pm UTC
https://wccftech.com/intel-in-the-water-for-lack-of-promised-driver-updates-and-gpus-for-arc-graphics/ > Over one month ago, Intel assured customers that the Intel ARC graphics lineup would see a driver update. Readers will remember that Intel created a separate branch code for the ARC and Iris drivers, which was older than the primary support that they have given for most of their integrated graphics. > The company's initial plans were to offer an updated driver by the last part of April, including the capability to deactivate optimizations focused on benchmarking. Including this update with the option to activate or deactivate the optimization would allow users to achieve more validity in their UL 3D mark benchmark test scores. With it currently missing, any UL 3D Mark tests processed with included optimization would be considered invalid due to UL's policies. However, the performance at this point sites at an increase of fifteen percent.