AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32 Core CPU Is 53% Faster Than Intel’s Core i9-7980XE 18 Core – Cinebench Benchmark Performance Detailed Officially

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32 Core CPU Is 53% Faster Than Intel’s Core i9-7980XE 18 Core – Cinebench Benchmark Performance Detailed Officially

6 years ago
Anonymous $oIHRkISgaL

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-crushes-intel-core-i9-7980xe-cinebench-benchmark/

AMD has mistakenly listed the Cinebench benchmark performance numbers of their upcoming flagship, the 32 core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX processor. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000 series is expected to hit markets in about a week or so and while we got to see it’s specifications and prices a few days ago, the performance numbers are yet to be revealed.

In the official transcript posted over at AMD’s France webpage, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is listed as the most powerful desktop processor in the world. It’s without a doubt the beefiest CPU to make its way in the HEDT market so AMD’s claims hold lots of weight to it. Following is the excerpt from the now removed/updated section of the webpage which listed the performance numbers:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32 Core CPU Is 53% Faster Than Intel’s Core i9-7980XE 18 Core – Cinebench Benchmark Performance Detailed Officially

Aug 5, 2018, 10:16pm UTC
https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-crushes-intel-core-i9-7980xe-cinebench-benchmark/ > AMD has mistakenly listed the Cinebench benchmark performance numbers of their upcoming flagship, the 32 core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX processor. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000 series is expected to hit markets in about a week or so and while we got to see it’s specifications and prices a few days ago, the performance numbers are yet to be revealed. > In the official transcript posted over at AMD’s France webpage, the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is listed as the most powerful desktop processor in the world. It’s without a doubt the beefiest CPU to make its way in the HEDT market so AMD’s claims hold lots of weight to it. Following is the excerpt from the now removed/updated section of the webpage which listed the performance numbers: