Supreme Court Says Civil Asset Forfeiture Violates Constitutional Protections Against Excessive Fines

Supreme Court Says Civil Asset Forfeiture Violates Constitutional Protections Against Excessive Fines

5 years ago
Anonymous $Dftgs0JzgE

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190220/09290441636/supreme-court-says-civil-asset-forfeiture-violates-constitutional-protections-against-excessive-fines.shtml

Great news on the asset forfeiture front, courtesy of the highest court in the land. The Supreme Court has ruled that forfeitures can violate the Eighth Amendment's protections against excessive fines.

The case the Supreme Court ruled on deals with Indiana native Tyson Timbs. Timbs sold $260 worth of heroin to undercover officers. He pled guilty to criminal charges. The state decided to forfeit his $42,000 Land Rover via civil asset forfeiture, routing around the criminal system to make it easier for cops to make off with his vehicle. Timbs challenged this forfeiture as an excessive fine, given that the max fine for his criminal charges was $10,000.

Last Seen
4 years ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
16 minutes ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
29 minutes ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
2 hours ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
36 minutes ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
5 hours ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
10 minutes ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000
Last Seen
12 minutes ago
Reputation
0
Spam
0.000