After criticism, federal officials to revisit policy for reviewing risky virus experiments
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/after-criticism-federal-officials-revisit-policy-reviewing-risky-virus-experiments
Some scientists are calling for more transparency about government reviews of research that could make the H5N1 influenza virus more risky to humans.
A long-running debate over U.S. government-funded research that tweaks risky pathogens in ways that could make them more dangerous to humans is flaring up again. This time, at issue is whether officials should make public the work of a closed-door federal committee that weighs the risks and benefits of experiments proposed for funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and in the past 2 years has greenlighted two controversial avian influenza studies.
After criticism, federal officials to revisit policy for reviewing risky virus experiments
Jan 24, 2020, 11:16pm UTC
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/after-criticism-federal-officials-revisit-policy-reviewing-risky-virus-experiments
> Some scientists are calling for more transparency about government reviews of research that could make the H5N1 influenza virus more risky to humans.
> A long-running debate over U.S. government-funded research that tweaks risky pathogens in ways that could make them more dangerous to humans is flaring up again. This time, at issue is whether officials should make public the work of a closed-door federal committee that weighs the risks and benefits of experiments proposed for funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and in the past 2 years has greenlighted two controversial avian influenza studies.