Neanderthals’ barrel chests might not have been any bigger than ours

Neanderthals’ barrel chests might not have been any bigger than ours

6 years ago
Anonymous $yysEBM5EYi

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/neanderthals-barrel-chests-might-not-have-been-any-bigger-ours

Though humans often consider ourselves far more evolved and refined than Neanderthals, new research has shown we have a lot common with our stocky, hairy cousins in terms of behavior and development. Now, scientists say Neanderthals’ thoraxes—the cozy cavities enclosed by the ribs, breastbone, and spine—might actually have been the same size as ours, not larger, as was previously assumed.

The size and shape of the thorax—which contains the lungs, heart, and other precious organs—holds important clues about human evolution, including posture, gait, and lung capacity. But it has been tough for researchers to analyze Neanderthal torsos because ribs and spines are fragile, and therefore scarce in the fossil record.

Neanderthals’ barrel chests might not have been any bigger than ours

Oct 30, 2018, 5:21pm UTC
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/neanderthals-barrel-chests-might-not-have-been-any-bigger-ours > Though humans often consider ourselves far more evolved and refined than Neanderthals, new research has shown we have a lot common with our stocky, hairy cousins in terms of behavior and development. Now, scientists say Neanderthals’ thoraxes—the cozy cavities enclosed by the ribs, breastbone, and spine—might actually have been the same size as ours, not larger, as was previously assumed. > The size and shape of the thorax—which contains the lungs, heart, and other precious organs—holds important clues about human evolution, including posture, gait, and lung capacity. But it has been tough for researchers to analyze Neanderthal torsos because ribs and spines are fragile, and therefore scarce in the fossil record.